1982 Austin Ambassador vs. 2005 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Ambassador would be higher. At 1,698 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Ambassador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (83 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Ambassador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Austin Ambassador weights approximately 765 kg more than 2005 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Ambassador, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Ambassador | 2005 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Austin | Westfield |
Model | Ambassador | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1698 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2320 mm |