1982 Austin Ambassador vs. 2010 Audi A5
To start off, 2010 Audi A5 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Ambassador would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi A5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A5 (211 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (91 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A5 (349 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (155 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Ambassador | 2010 Audi A5 | |
Make | Austin | Audi |
Model | Ambassador | A5 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4625 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1382 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2751 mm |