1982 Austin Ambassador vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Ambassador would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Ambassador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (91 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Ambassador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Austin Ambassador weights approximately 13 kg more than 2011 Honda CR-Z.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-Z (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (155 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2011 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Ambassador | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | Ambassador | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 1000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 1202 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2436 mm |