1982 Austin Ambassador vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Ambassador would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Because 2012 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Ambassador, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (131 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Ambassador | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | Ambassador | Colorado |
Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1698 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 131 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |