1982 Austin Ambassador vs. 2012 Renault Megane
To start off, 2012 Renault Megane is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Ambassador would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (91 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (155 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Ambassador | 2012 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | Ambassador | Megane |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 155 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |
