1982 Austin Ambassador vs. 2013 Honda Fit
To start off, 2013 Honda Fit is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Ambassador would be higher. At 1,698 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Ambassador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda Fit (115 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (83 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Ambassador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Austin Ambassador weights approximately 89 kg more than 2013 Honda Fit.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Honda Fit (144 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (131 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Honda Fit will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Ambassador | 2013 Honda Fit | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | Ambassador | Fit |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1698 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2500 mm |