1982 Austin Marina vs. 1948 Simca 8
To start off, 1982 Austin Marina is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Simca 8 would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Marina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Austin Marina (59 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1948 Simca 8. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Austin Marina should accelerate faster than 1948 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Simca 8 weights approximately 68 kg more than 1982 Austin Marina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Austin Marina (102 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Simca 8. (88 Nm). This means 1982 Austin Marina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Simca 8.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Marina | 1948 Simca 8 | |
Make | Austin | Simca |
Model | Marina | 8 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 88 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 882 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2450 mm |