1982 Austin Marina vs. 1964 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1982 Austin Marina is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1128 kg more than 1982 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Marina | 1964 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Marina | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 882 kg | 2010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3300 mm |
