1982 Austin Marina vs. 1969 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1982 Austin Marina is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1193 kg more than 1982 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Cadillac Calais (710 Nm) has 608 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Marina. (102 Nm). This means 1969 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Marina.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Marina | 1969 Cadillac Calais | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Marina | Calais |
Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 710 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 109.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 103.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 882 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3300 mm |