1982 Austin Marina vs. 1969 Ford Capri
To start off, 1982 Austin Marina is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Capri would be higher. At 1,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Ford Capri is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Capri (63 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Capri should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Capri weights approximately 33 kg more than 1982 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Marina | 1969 Ford Capri | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Marina | Capri |
Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 63 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 882 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2570 mm |