1982 Austin Marina vs. 1969 Renault 4
To start off, 1982 Austin Marina is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Marina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Austin Marina (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1969 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Austin Marina should accelerate faster than 1969 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Austin Marina weights approximately 232 kg more than 1969 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Marina | 1969 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | Marina | 4 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 745 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 882 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2410 mm |
