1982 Austin Marina vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1982 Austin Marina is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 60 kg more than 1982 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Marina. (102 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Marina.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Marina | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Marina | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1982 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 882 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2210 mm |