1982 Austin Marina vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1982 Austin Marina is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 444 kg more than 1982 Austin Marina.
Because 1982 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Marina | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Austin | Oldsmobile |
Model | Marina | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1982 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2568 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 882 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2680 mm |