1982 Austin Marina vs. 1990 Volvo 960

To start off, 1990 Volvo 960 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Volvo 960 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Volvo 960 (204 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Volvo 960 weights approximately 678 kg more than 1982 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Volvo 960 (267 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Marina. (102 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1990 Volvo 960 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Marina.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Austin Marina 1990 Volvo 960
Make Austin Volvo
Model Marina 960
Year Released 1982 1990
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1275 cc 2922 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 59 HP 204 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 102 Nm 267 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4300 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 882 kg 1560 kg
Vehicle Length 4230 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2780 mm