1982 Austin Marina vs. 1996 Eagle Vision

To start off, 1996 Eagle Vision is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Eagle Vision weights approximately 688 kg more than 1982 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Marina has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Marina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: