1982 Austin Marina vs. 1996 Subaru Outback
To start off, 1996 Subaru Outback is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Subaru Outback (165 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina.
Because 1996 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Marina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Subaru Outback (221 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Marina. (102 Nm). This means 1996 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Marina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Marina | 1996 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Austin | Subaru |
| Model | Marina | Outback |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 99.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 79 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2530 mm |
