1982 Austin Marina vs. 1997 Acura CL

To start off, 1997 Acura CL is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Marina would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura CL (200 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura CL weights approximately 698 kg more than 1982 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Acura CL has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Marina has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Marina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Acura CL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: