1982 Austin Marina vs. 2000 Seat Arosa

To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Marina would be higher. At 1,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Arosa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 407 kg more than 1982 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Arosa (117 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Marina. (102 Nm). This means 2000 Seat Arosa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Marina.

Compare all specifications: