1982 Austin Marina vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Marina would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano (187 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano (281 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Marina. (102 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Marina.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Marina | 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Marina | Viano |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3210 mm |