1982 Austin Marina vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Marina would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (134 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina.
Because 1982 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (188 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Marina. (102 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Marina.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Marina | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | Marina | Megane |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 188 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2690 mm |