1982 Austin Marina vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 181 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Marina. (102 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Marina.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Marina | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | Marina | Commodore |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |