1982 Austin Marina vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Marina would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Marina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (316 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Marina. (102 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Marina.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Marina | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Marina | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 169 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 316 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2630 mm |