1982 Austin Marina vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Marina would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Marina. (102 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Marina.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Marina | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Marina | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2640 mm |