1982 Austin Marina vs. 2011 Nissan Note
To start off, 2011 Nissan Note is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Marina would be higher. At 1,386 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Note is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Note (89 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Note should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Nissan Note weights approximately 170 kg more than 1982 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Austin Marina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Austin Marina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Marina | 2011 Nissan Note | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Marina | Note |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 882 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2600 mm |