1982 Austin Marina vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Marina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Marina would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1982 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 688 kg more than 1982 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (373 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Marina. (102 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Marina. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Marina has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Marina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Austin Marina 2013 Cadillac ATS
Make Austin Cadillac
Model Marina ATS
Year Released 1982 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1275 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 59 HP 317 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 102 Nm 373 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 70.6 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.3 mm 86 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 882 kg 1570 kg
Vehicle Length 4230 mm 4643 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1806 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1417 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2776 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]