1982 Austin Princess vs. 1948 Maserati A6GCS
To start off, 1982 Austin Princess is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Maserati A6GCS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Austin Princess weights approximately 540 kg more than 1948 Maserati A6GCS.
Because 1948 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Princess | 1948 Maserati A6GCS | |
Make | Austin | Maserati |
Model | Princess | A6GCS |
Year Released | 1982 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 620 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2320 mm |