1982 Austin Princess vs. 1952 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1982 Austin Princess is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,987 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Austin Princess weights approximately 610 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G.
Because 1952 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Princess | 1952 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Austin | Maserati |
| Model | Princess | A6G |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 550 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2290 mm |
