1982 Austin Princess vs. 1956 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1982 Austin Princess is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 925 kg more than 1982 Austin Princess.
Because 1956 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1956 Cadillac Eldorado has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1956 Cadillac Eldorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Princess | 1956 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Princess | Eldorado |
Year Released | 1982 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 5980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3280 mm |