1982 Austin Princess vs. 1960 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1982 Austin Princess is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,700 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Austin Princess weights approximately 194 kg more than 1960 Ford Taunus.
Because 1960 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Princess | 1960 Ford Taunus | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | Princess | Taunus |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2640 mm |
