1982 Austin Princess vs. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 1982 Austin Princess is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 660 kg more than 1982 Austin Princess.
Because 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Princess | 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Austin | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Princess | Starfire |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5370 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3130 mm |
