1982 Austin Princess vs. 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Princess would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 940 kg more than 1982 Austin Princess.
Because 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Princess | 2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Princess | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 4157 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 269 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2880 mm |