1982 Austin Princess vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Princess would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 48 kg more than 1982 Austin Princess.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Princess | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Princess | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3010 mm |