1982 Austin Princess vs. 2006 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2006 Cadillac XLR is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Princess would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 496 kg more than 1982 Austin Princess.
Because 2006 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Princess | 2006 Cadillac XLR | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Princess | XLR |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 4572 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 320 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2690 mm |