1982 Austin Princess vs. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Princess would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 775 kg more than 1982 Austin Princess.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Princess | 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | Princess | Grand Voyager |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 2429 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3040 mm |