1982 Austin Princess vs. 2010 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2010 GMC Sierra is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Princess would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Sierra weights approximately 734 kg more than 1982 Austin Princess.
Because 2010 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 GMC Sierra has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 GMC Sierra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Princess | 2010 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Austin | GMC |
Model | Princess | Sierra |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 5999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 312 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1894 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 6580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 4250 mm |