1982 Austin Princess vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Princess would be higher. At 1,700 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Princess | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | Princess | Cruze |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2685 mm |