1982 Austin Princess vs. 2011 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2011 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Princess would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1555 kg more than 1982 Austin Princess.
Because 2011 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Toyota Sequoia has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Toyota Sequoia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Princess | 2011 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | Princess | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1956 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3099 mm |
