1982 Austin Princess vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Princess would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 279 kg more than 1982 Austin Princess.
Because 2013 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Lotus Evora has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Lotus Evora will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Austin Princess | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Austin | Lotus |
| Model | Princess | Evora |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 276 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1439 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2575 mm |
