1982 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1949 Bristol 402
To start off, 1982 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 402. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 402 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Bristol 402 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Bristol 402 weights approximately 565 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1949 Bristol 402 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Bristol 402. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Autobianchi A 112 | 1949 Bristol 402 | |
Make | Autobianchi | Bristol |
Model | A 112 | 402 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 77 L |