1982 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1982 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 990 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1952 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Autobianchi A 112 | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Talbot |
| Model | A 112 | Baby |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 3130 mm |
