1982 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1964 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1982 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,594 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Triumph Vitesse weights approximately 220 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1964 Triumph Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Triumph Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Autobianchi A 112 | 1964 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Autobianchi | Triumph |
Model | A 112 | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1982 | 1964 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 29 L |