1982 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1965 Jaguar Type S
To start off, 1982 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jaguar Type S weights approximately 960 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1965 Jaguar Type S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Jaguar Type S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Autobianchi A 112 | 1965 Jaguar Type S | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Jaguar |
| Model | A 112 | Type S |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 3440 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 90 L |
