1982 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1180 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Autobianchi A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1982 Autobianchi A 112 has manual transmission. 1982 Autobianchi A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Autobianchi A 112 | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 3010 mm |