1982 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 4,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 263 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2002 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1982 Autobianchi A 112 has manual transmission. 1982 Autobianchi A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Autobianchi A 112 | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Autobianchi | Toyota |
Model | A 112 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 4698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 245 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 923 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 70 L |