1982 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2003 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2003 Lincoln LS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 3,934 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lincoln LS weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2003 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Autobianchi A 112 | 2003 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Autobianchi | Lincoln |
Model | A 112 | LS |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 3934 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 276 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |