1982 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2004 BMW 320
To start off, 2004 BMW 320 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 320 weights approximately 650 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2004 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Autobianchi A 112 | 2004 BMW 320 | |
Make | Autobianchi | BMW |
Model | A 112 | 320 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 67 L |