1982 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2009 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2009 Mercury Mariner is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 1265 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2009 Mercury Mariner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Autobianchi A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Mariner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Autobianchi A 112 | 2009 Mercury Mariner | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Mercury |
| Model | A 112 | Mariner |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 57 L |
