1982 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 890 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Autobianchi A 112 | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Autobianchi | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 112 | Colt |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 47 L |