1982 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 764 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Autobianchi A 112 | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Autobianchi | Toyota |
Model | A 112 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1424 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 50 L |