1982 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1233 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Autobianchi A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1982 Autobianchi A 112 has manual transmission. 1982 Autobianchi A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Autobianchi A 112 | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Autobianchi | Volvo |
Model | A 112 | XC60 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1893 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2774 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 70 L |